2 for the $

[sakio pod]

one of the best i have seen in a long time

[maddlingo]

Re: 2 for the $

I really wanted to like this movie more, but unfortunately it fell short of my expectations. I thought the entire story line was predictable including the ending. I don't want to give anything away for those who saw it. I also expected more from Al Pacino's character.

[man_who_wasnt_there]

Re: 2 for the $

Quite a lame film overall, just another payday for Pacino IMO.

[Platinum]

Re: 2 for the $

Quite a lame film overall, just another payday for Pacino IMO.

Couldnt agree with you more, I thought this movie was awful... I just dont know what it was about it but it didnt do anything for me in terms of entertainment... cheers

[nbpgt]

Re: 2 for the $

i feel it wasnt all that. good movie, just fell short of great. & was kinda predicitible.

[asdf_admin]

Re: 2 for the $

Quite a lame film overall, just another payday for Pacino IMO.

hesh. could not be said better. still a pretty solid movie. Felt it was really a copycat but with a new subject. I am happy I rented this and did not spend $75 going to the movies for a tub of popcorn and two movie tickets.

[sakio pod]

Re: 2 for the $

damn guess there's some haters in the house

[SupaLindo]

Re: 2 for the $

the story did seem a it familiar and predictable

[man_who_wasnt_there]

Re: 2 for the $

Best stick to Wall Street or Glengarry Glen Ross.

[peloquin]

Re: 2 for the $

crap movie