Originally posted by Civic_Zen
No it is fatalism...you basically just make a circular argument...you started with a conclusion and ended with it...
One thing you did say is true...OK??
that we are always at strife...that is a FACT...i AGREE...BUT....
we can be TACTFUL with our strife, we can argue, we can reduce our omnipresent strife to a stage of reason...THE ARGUMENT...that CAN happen...it does not need to be overextended into causing mass chaos simply because we must be at strife...that is what you fatalism ultimately causes
we have to harness the basic fundamental principles you stated and just live with it...rather than saying "oh thats just your opinion," you should come back at me with full effect and give me an argument...therefore, we would always be DIALECTICAL...we would always be doing what is BEST in a dynamic way...and STILLLL be at one with entropy...ok???
we are at war naturally...FACT,,, BUT...your normative reality says go all out and dont hold back...mine says, be at war through REASON!
i agree with your facts, but your fatalism really is a reality...sorry to say
Leave a comment: