you know what's astonishing?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • chunky
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by res0nat0r
    massive fucking fail.com for the 100th time. you know they haven't been able to reproduce the twin towers collapsing either. you know why? they haven't built 110 story buildings yet and rammed planes into em.
    I was talking about building 7

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by chunky
    Maybe its because I don't have a belief system in place
    you do have a system. it is 'i automatically dont believe shit if it is any way associated with anyone in power anywhere, because im pissed off'. easy 1 line summary.

    Leave a comment:


  • floridaorange
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by chunky
    No problem understanding it. Are you saying Underwriters Laboratories could weaken the steel enough for the collapse when they tried to recreate what happened in the furnaces.

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by chunky
    No problem understanding it. Are you saying Underwriters Laboratories could weaken the steel enough for the collapse when they tried to recreate what happened in the furnaces.
    massive fucking fail.com for the 100th time. you know they haven't been able to reproduce the twin towers collapsing either. you know why? they haven't built 110 story buildings yet and rammed planes into em.

    Leave a comment:


  • chunky
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by res0nat0r
    no conflict. you just dont understand what ur reading
    Maybe its because I don't have a belief system in place

    Leave a comment:


  • chunky
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by res0nat0r
    no conflict. you just dont understand what ur reading
    No problem understanding it. Are you saying Underwriters Laboratories could weaken the steel enough for the collapse when they tried to recreate what happened in the furnaces.

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by chunky
    Ah fuck you're not back on the science again are you Res0. The fact that you don't see a conflict in the science says it all.
    no conflict. you just dont understand what ur reading

    Leave a comment:


  • chunky
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by floridaorange
    The conflict lies in what our government deems classified and non-classified. When it comes to 9/11 every nuance and fine detail, picture, video, etc should be available for the world to see. I commend our government for being able to keep the information classified actually.

    Leave a comment:


  • floridaorange
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by chunky
    Ah fuck you're not back on the science again are you Res0. The fact that you don't see a conflict in the science says it all.
    The conflict lies in what our government deems classified and non-classified. When it comes to 9/11 every nuance and fine detail, picture, video, etc should be available for the world to see. I commend our government for being able to keep the information classified actually.

    Leave a comment:


  • chunky
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by res0nat0r
    nothing to do with the science that clearly explained why it fell. fail.
    Ah fuck you're not back on the science again are you Res0. The fact that you don't see a conflict in the science says it all.

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by chunky
    Is that the same common sense that told you Bush wasn't complicit in torture Res0 of your antique CCTV theory.
    nothing to do with the science that clearly explained why it fell. fail.

    Leave a comment:


  • floridaorange
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Suggesting that classified files were not released when an act of war was taken against the US is one thing. Suggesting the government is actually behind the act of war is another.

    What I initially found fascinating was how eager individuals from outside the US were to gobble up the story presented by internet conspiracy theorists ... which in return suggests that although America is the leader of the free world, probably 1/4 of individuals living outside the US don't trust the US to the extent that they would literally kill their own citizens by masterminding an attack on NYC. That is what I found astonishing. Then this thread turned in to what it turned into, a place for 2 sometimes 3 members to fight for their right to think critically and question everything. I'm all for questing things and I agree that things are RARELY what they seem. But to assume the Bush presidency planned 9/11 is another thing entirely.

    Leave a comment:


  • chunky
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    maybe its because we don't have a Belief System, whatever the fuck that is

    Leave a comment:


  • chunky
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by res0nat0r
    So common sense is missing from you both on this one? Just because it means some insidious rich white people weren't behind it from the beginning huh? Fail.
    Is that the same common sense that told you Bush wasn't complicit in torture Res0 of your antique CCTV theory.

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: you know what's astonishing?

    Originally posted by chunky
    Yes that is what I'm saying. You're saying is the 2 buildings collapsed and a chunk of debris skittled its way across to building 7 caused a fire and brought down a building at near free fall speed.
    Originally posted by Shpira


    Not everything that most people like or believe in is good/true...in fact it usually works the other way around.
    So common sense is missing from you both on this one? Just because it means some insidious rich white people weren't behind it from the beginning huh? Fail.

    Leave a comment:

Working...