If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
lol @ Biden not having a clue what obama wants to do with iran. when palin was saying that obama would be willing to meet with the iranian pres without preconditions biden said: "his is simply not true about Barack Obama. He did not say sit down with Ahmadinejad."
from obama's site:
Obama supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions.
Obama's Campaign and Supporters: Obama and Biden sweep the debates
McCain's Campaign and Supporters: McCain and Palin sweep the debates
Ok shosh, I'm sorry but I just have to ask. I've been dying to know: Your avowed hatred of Obama and his lack of experience aside for a moment...can you possibly deny that Palin has turned out to be a horrifically unqualified choice by McCain?
lol @ Biden not having a clue what obama wants to do with iran. when palin was saying that obama would be willing to meet with the iranian pres without preconditions biden said: "his is simply not true about Barack Obama. He did not say sit down with Ahmadinejad."
OK, first off, Ahmadinejad is not the leader of Iran, and unless he's done it very recently, he has never, in fact, said he'd sit down with Ahmadinejad, period. More importantly, though, haven't we all been over this before? It's a semantic difference, the difference between "preparations" and "preconditions." If you've made it to this point in the election season and you sincerely believe that Obama intends to invite Ahmadinijad over for a BBQ right off the bat, you're either not paying attention, are listening selectively, or are being intellectually dishonest. No one believes that.
Ok shosh, I'm sorry but I just have to ask. I've been dying to know: Your avowed hatred of Obama and his lack of experience aside for a moment...can you possibly deny that Palin has turned out to be a horrifically unqualified choice by McCain?
i never said she was the best choice or that i agree with what mccain's choice. so yeah i do agree that she is unqualified. tbh i didnt even want mccain to be the gop nominee. and i actually believe that neither obama nor mccain are going to do any good.
glad i could help you stay alive
OK, first off, Ahmadinejad is not the leader of Iran, and unless he's done it very recently, he has never, in fact, said he'd sit down with Ahmadinejad, period. More importantly, though, haven't we all been over this before? It's a semantic difference, the difference between "preparations" and "preconditions." If you've made it to this point in the election season and you sincerely believe that Obama intends to invite Ahmadinijad over for a BBQ right off the bat, you're either not paying attention, are listening selectively, or are being intellectually dishonest. No one believes that.
wait wat?
Ahmadinejad is the president of Iran, isn't he? Obama says right on his website that he "supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions."
Ahmadinejad is the president of Iran, isn't he? Obama says right on his website that he "supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions."
Hey dumbass, that means the US president, not the president of Iran.
direct presidential diplomacy means to me president to president...
im just reading the words, why are you twisting them?
OK, so what happens when the US decides to negotiate with a country that doesn't have a president? And what would be the point of having negotiations with the president when the leader of the country is actually the Supreme Leader? It makes no sense.
"Direct presidential diplomacy" means "our president is directly involved in diplomacy." It's the only interpretation that makes any sense.
technically ahmadinejad is the president (has executive powers), the supreme leader is Ali Khamenei, the ayatollah
Kinda surprised you know this, makes me wonder why you're so worked up about Ahmadinejad since you know he's not the "leader" of Iran and therefore not the person Obama would be negotiating with anyway. Seems a touch disingenuous.
And by the way, lest there be any confusion about who has what duties, the Ayatollah is the supreme commander of the Iranian armed forces and has the sole authority to declare war and peace.
lol @ Biden not having a clue what obama wants to do with iran. when palin was saying that obama would be willing to meet with the iranian pres without preconditions biden said: "his is simply not true about Barack Obama. He did not say sit down with Ahmadinejad."
Kinda surprised you know this, makes me wonder why you're so worked up about Ahmadinejad since you know he's not the "leader" of Iran and therefore not the person Obama would be negotiating with anyway. Seems a touch disingenuous.
And by the way, lest there be any confusion about who has what duties, the Ayatollah is the supreme commander of the Iranian armed forces and has the sole authority to declare war and peace.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment