mercuryserver progressive culture • est. 2002

2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AchtungBaby!
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    Nice game from Argentina... Stage 3, clear

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Graham
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    right lol
    if Mexico keep trotting Blanco out there and bringing Hernandez off the bench, Argentina shouldn't have too much trouble putting them away

    Leave a comment:


  • AchtungBaby!
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    You never know Steve, you never know... Argentina is always a mistery

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Graham
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    Mexico may have lengthened their stay in south africa, but Argentina might be a bit much for them in the next round, lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Graham
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    ^^^ yes, and RSA will have more goals scored, since their head to head was a tie

    Leave a comment:


  • Kinetic
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    Originally posted by AchtungBaby!
    If im correct, a goal from Uruguay and another goal from bafana bafana will put them and Mexico in the same condition.. right?
    That´s right.

    Then I think the next criteria is goals scored.

    Leave a comment:


  • AchtungBaby!
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    As an Argentinian, i would prefer to play against Bafana Bafana on the next phase... Mexico is more solid imo

    Leave a comment:


  • Kinetic
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    Originally posted by Steve Graham
    what's a minute and half delay going to do?
    Mexico know they need at least a tie to keep their second round hopes in tueir own hands and RSA need at least 2 more goals

    i see your point, but I really don't think it's too keep south afirca in the competition.. if it were 5 or 10 minutes, maybe
    Ah well, maybe I´m paranoid ever since that South Korean World Cup...

    The French deserve all that theyére getting, that´s for sure, but I´d rather see Mexico than RSA go through, because they´re the better team IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • AchtungBaby!
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    If im correct, a goal from Uruguay and another goal from bafana bafana will put them and Mexico in the same condition.. right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Graham
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    if Uruguay score again, surely RSA would only need one more

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Graham
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    what's a minute and half delay going to do?
    Mexico know they need at least a tie to keep their second round hopes in tueir own hands and RSA need at least 2 more goals

    i see your point, but I really don't think it's too keep south afirca in the competition.. if it were 5 or 10 minutes, maybe

    Leave a comment:


  • AchtungBaby!
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    Uruguay is close to the second goal.. That might give bafana bafana a chance!

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Graham
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    oh, I missed that, watching at work
    again, whatever, karma bitches

    Leave a comment:


  • Kinetic
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    I thought I saw a penalty against SA go unmarked earlier on...

    Oh, and one minute and a half delay in the start of the South Africa-France 2nd half relating to the Uruguay-Mexico game. FIFA usually doesn´t allow these things to happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Graham
    replied
    Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

    what decisions? that was an elbow, red card was right
    they cheated to get to South Afirca and they're getting what they deserve.. KARMA

    Leave a comment:

Working...