Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Originally posted by bobjuice
    Sigh all you want old lad, it was you who started the thread stating "curiosity has landed". We now know that you weren't inviting discussion on the subject as dissenting voices have been silenced. So, were you informing us all of this event in case we hadn't heard already? Unlikely i'd have thought.
    Subsequent posts hinted at a kind of petty nationalism that does you no favours at all. "united states of space"? "gb got the olympics, we landed on mars"? - oh dear, another master race on the horizon is it?
    We all know Nasa is a body of great minds from all over the globe so why do you post pictures stating "we" did this backed by an american flag? Just to get a reaction I would guess, or trolling to put it in your own terms.
    After the embarrassing nationalism came the claims of space research helping the world, not before. There are by-products of all science that help others in some way or advance things more quickly than they otherwise would have by default, no argument there. But to say it helps everyone is simply not true.
    Missile technology may well advance at such a rate that you now have a new coating on your frying pan and medicine advances at a faster rate during wartime but it's a huge failure in joined up thinking to follow that logic through and say "war helps everyone".
    I didn't deny that it's a scientific achievement to land on Mars, of course it is. But i'm of the opinion that it an enormous use of resources for little known return. It is a luxury, like a holiday (as Kamal put it). So comparing luxuries to basic needs of humanity is fair enough i think when talking of resources. Or is humanity a less important denominator than that fucking flag of yours that you are brainwashed into singing songs at?

    I certainly didn't expect starvation to be made into a joke. "arbitrary hunger"? ffs (sigh)

    back out of what? I said
    Another thread successfully derailed.

    Leave a comment:


  • 88Mariner
    replied
    Re: Curiosity has landed

    Originally posted by floridaorange
    The problem Banned1 is that there is no sense of DECORUM on Mercury Server, I'm not sure why? In most public forums members either abide by certain general standards or they are banned. The general standards should be not to HIJACK a thread, instead start a new thread, and not cause a TRAINWRECK. The word trainwreck in this instance means to "DERAIL" the subject matter in a given thread intentionally.

    MS is the wild wild west of electronic music. we cover wide expanses. Not just trance, not just house, not just techno, not just ambient, but just about everything.


    If you demand 'decorum', might I recommend a more fascist board where even the slightest hint of dissent or banter is resolved with a permabannhammer?

    Do we not have the 'block' function on this forum???

    Leave a comment:


  • bobjuice
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    Leave a comment:


  • bobjuice
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    Sigh all you want old lad, it was you who started the thread stating "curiosity has landed". We now know that you weren't inviting discussion on the subject as dissenting voices have been silenced. So, were you informing us all of this event in case we hadn't heard already? Unlikely i'd have thought.
    Subsequent posts hinted at a kind of petty nationalism that does you no favours at all. "united states of space"? "gb got the olympics, we landed on mars"? - oh dear, another master race on the horizon is it?
    We all know Nasa is a body of great minds from all over the globe so why do you post pictures stating "we" did this backed by an american flag? Just to get a reaction I would guess, or trolling to put it in your own terms.
    After the embarrassing nationalism came the claims of space research helping the world, not before. There are by-products of all science that help others in some way or advance things more quickly than they otherwise would have by default, no argument there. But to say it helps everyone is simply not true.
    Missile technology may well advance at such a rate that you now have a new coating on your frying pan and medicine advances at a faster rate during wartime but it's a huge failure in joined up thinking to follow that logic through and say "war helps everyone".
    I didn't deny that it's a scientific achievement to land on Mars, of course it is. But i'm of the opinion that it an enormous use of resources for little known return. It is a luxury, like a holiday (as Kamal put it). So comparing luxuries to basic needs of humanity is fair enough i think when talking of resources. Or is humanity a less important denominator than that fucking flag of yours that you are brainwashed into singing songs at?

    I certainly didn't expect starvation to be made into a joke. "arbitrary hunger"? ffs (sigh)

    back out of what? I said

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    sigh

    Leave a comment:


  • bobjuice
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    back out of what?

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    The mods moved the trolling from the other thread to this one, it's impossible for you to back out now.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobjuice
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    This looks like I started this thread but I didn't so please either change title or remove my posts
    Thanks
    Joking about starvation? Very cool

    Leave a comment:


  • AchtungBaby!
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    Originally posted by picklemonkey
    NASA is pushing research of growing food via hydroponics: Wikimedia Error

    And they're imaging cancer: http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/tec...at_cancer.html

    They're also treating cancer: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/nasalife/...ls_photos.html

    They're preventing Heart failure: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/mo...opic_lvad.html

    And treating depression: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD)



    I could Google this all day long Their program has a global impact. As others have said, they aren't going to cure every single problem, but their focus is definitely on more than just space travel.
    Good to know... cool

    Leave a comment:


  • picklemonkey
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    NASA is pushing research of growing food via hydroponics: Wikimedia Error

    And they're imaging cancer: http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/tec...at_cancer.html

    They're also treating cancer: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/nasalife/...ls_photos.html

    They're preventing Heart failure: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/mo...opic_lvad.html

    And treating depression: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD)



    I could Google this all day long Their program has a global impact. As others have said, they aren't going to cure every single problem, but their focus is definitely on more than just space travel.

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    you and your damn pikey gif's

    Leave a comment:


  • floridaorange
    replied
    Re: Curiosity has landed

    Originally posted by thebanned1
    fuck sake... another thread that soon gets lowered to the depth of ms internal arguments and i,ve only read the last page and a half

    not wanting to get involved in anything i,m gonna put my feelings across about the subject

    The problem Banned1 is that there is no sense of DECORUM on Mercury Server, I'm not sure why? In most public forums members either abide by certain general standards or they are banned. The general standards should be not to HIJACK a thread, instead start a new thread, and not cause a TRAINWRECK. The word trainwreck in this instance means to "DERAIL" the subject matter in a given thread intentionally.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jenks
    replied
    Re: Space Projects Vs. Starvation - An [ms] debate...

    How Does NASA Research Affect My Life?

    Leave a comment:


  • thebanned1
    replied
    Re: Curiosity has landed

    fuck sake... another thread that soon gets lowered to the depth of ms internal arguments and i,ve only read the last page and a half

    not wanting to get involved in anything i,m gonna put my feelings across about the subject

    imo getting off this planet to another world is probably one of the most important things humans can do for every living thing on the planet because if we don't then everything is going to die and again imo that would be such a waste of something so precious, the sun is going to explode one day taking out the whole system and yet were in a position to move on and continue life... its a great feat for not only mankind but also every living thing on the planet and i think that instead of certain countries doing it on their own i think they should get together and do it on a global scale... it important

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamal
    replied
    Re: Curiosity has landed

    Are you expecting a different response by saying it again and again? That I'm taking it personally? I haven't taken anything personally, but senseless arguments do get a rise of out me. But if having your last word is what tickles your fanny pack, then I'll let you indulge in the glory. I promise you I won't reply anymore.

    Leave a comment:

Working...