Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

[res0nat0r]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

I read the link thanks. Not much science or physics there though, unless you're 12 years old. Which you may well be for all I know??

Here's a childish animated picture with as much relevance as you want to attach to it.

.

well...you need this page then Final Reports from the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation

All kinds of fun stuff related to wtc7 at the bottom.

[floridaorange]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

No, it's an honest question. What does it matter?

[audrey_w]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

What does it matter that building 7 collapsed?

I nearly replied but this comment has to be a fucking wind up, surely.

[audrey_w]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

read the link above, that is backed by actual, uh, crazy talk like science and physics.

I read the link thanks. Not much science or physics there though, unless you're 12 years old. Which you may well be for all I know??

Here's a childish animated picture with as much relevance as you want to attach to it.

.

[Barn Dog]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

read the link above, that is backed by actual, uh, crazy talk like science and physics.

This is a synopsis, there is no data to back up anything in it

[res0nat0r]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

^cia

[floridaorange]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

What does it matter that building 7 collapsed?

[res0nat0r]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

read the link above, that is backed by actual, uh, crazy talk like science and physics.

[audrey_w]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

The World Trade Centers fell into their own footprint, are we arguing that those were also controlled demo's by our gov't?"

No one is arguing that here, neither are they blaming Bush like you concluded earlier. You do sound in need of some reassurance though.
The big question that remains unanswered is why building 7 just collapsed, as the fabric of the building was wholly intact. As yet you've offered nothing in the way of an explanation and seem to mock those that try to. Tell us what you believe, i'm interested to hear.

It was office fires, yo.

The demo of the block in glasgow I used as an example previously cost £1.2million, serious money. I guess, with hindsight they could have just bought a box of matches??

[Barn Dog]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

meh.

World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest - Popular Mechanics

Spurred by conspiracy theorists' questions, investigators did look specifically at the possibility that explosives were involved. "Hypothetical blast events did not play a role in the collapse of WTC 7," the report states, adding that investigators "found no evidence whose explanation required invocation of a blast event." Moreover, the smallest charge capable of initiating column failure "would have resulted in a sound level of 130 dB [decibels] to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile." Witnesses did not report hearing such a loud noise, nor is one audible on recordings of the collapse.

actually there is plenty of video footage that contradicts that statement. I can dig it out of you want.

[res0nat0r]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

^yes. it was all bombs yo.

[floridaorange]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

The World Trade Centers fell into their own footprint, are we arguing that those were also controlled demo's by our gov't?


perhaps it's time to re-open "you know what's astonishing?"

[res0nat0r]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

meh.

World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest - Popular Mechanics

[audrey_w]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

It makes me lol a bit though that people keep thinking of silly stories like this, but think for some reason that large objects crashing down onto other objects might be a cause for enough instability to cause something to break...

Did you post that in the right thread? This discussion is about a steel framed building that wasn't unstable at all. To suggest things falling onto it (of no significant size) caused a simultaneous collapse throughout the building's internal structure is silly indeed. And I lol a bit at the absurdity.

[res0nat0r]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

It makes me lol a bit though that people keep thinking of silly stories like this, but think for some reason that large objects crashing down onto other objects might be a cause for enough instability to cause something to break...