Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • audrey_w
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    physics >denial or blind patriotism

    Leave a comment:


  • Barn Dog
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    9 hours 50 minutes, I hope banned is on his way to the co-op for a tim of beans, stopping to high five with his buddy's from the steel yard.

    Leave a comment:


  • audrey_w
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by thebanned1
    as a kid i did this many times.... we stood cans on the ground and stamped on the can..... it completely fell in on itself leaving nothing but a circular flat can.. we used to kick them around the school yard
    You stamped on the can? Why did you not just place your foot upon it gently to achieve the same ? Because you had to apply a force greater than the resistance of the material in question

    bing focking OOOOOOOOOOO

    Leave a comment:


  • Barn Dog
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by thebanned1
    the logistics behind the theory that it was a controlled demolition bin that theory almost straight away....thousands of people involved in many months of sneaking into a highly secured building with huge boxes of explosives and other shit
    How many people? LOL

    The clock is ticking Tin Pot Theory

    Leave a comment:


  • Barn Dog
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    10 hours 40 minutes

    Leave a comment:


  • Barn Dog
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by thebanned1
    as a kid i did this many times.... we stood cans on the ground and stamped on the can..... it completely fell in on itself leaving nothing but a circular flat can.. we used to kick them around the school yard
    What really, LOL your comparing the force a child would have to flatten a can to flattening a building straight down. How heavy is a child compaired to your Iron Brew can?

    Leave a comment:


  • thebanned1
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by res0nat0r
    banned1 it doesn't matter. youtube videos analyzed by college kids > physics. you've already lost.
    yea i better bow out m8.... i,m completely fucked if that is the case

    Leave a comment:


  • thebanned1
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    the logistics behind the theory that it was a controlled demolition bin that theory almost straight away....thousands of people involved in many months of sneaking into a highly secured building with huge boxes of explosives and other shit

    Leave a comment:


  • thebanned1
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by audrey_w
    But your thumbs and fingers, in attempting your analogy would meet some resistance no? Whereas this building, and the other 2 steel framed buildings that collapsed due to fire that day, met none. How odd
    as a kid i did this many times.... we stood cans on the ground and stamped on the can..... it completely fell in on itself leaving nothing but a circular flat can.. we used to kick them around the school yard

    Leave a comment:


  • res0nat0r
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    banned1 it doesn't matter. youtube videos analyzed by college kids > physics. you've already lost.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barn Dog
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by audrey_w
    But your thumbs and fingers, in attempting your analogy would meet some resistance no? Whereas this building, and the other 2 steel framed buildings that collapsed due to fire that day, met none. How odd
    I should have added a 11 second limit to the bet LOL. O well I'm feeling generous. 11 hours 40 minute to go

    Leave a comment:


  • Barn Dog
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by thebanned1
    my thumb and fingers can't make thousands of tons of pressure created by tons and tons of steel and concrete... you obviously missed the point
    No but you claim you can do it with a Red Bull can. I'm telling you to do it with a bean can, something only slightly stronger.

    Leave a comment:


  • audrey_w
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by thebanned1
    my thumb and fingers can't make thousands of tons of pressure created by tons and tons of steel and concrete... you obviously missed the point
    But your thumbs and fingers, in attempting your analogy would meet some resistance no? Whereas this building, and the other 2 steel framed buildings that collapsed due to fire that day, met none. How odd

    Leave a comment:


  • thebanned1
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by audrey_w
    If the top and bottom of the tin come together in uniform fashion, ie without mis-shaping to one side, then i'll back the above with £100
    tell you what... prove to me it was a controlled demolition... i,m dying to see it

    Leave a comment:


  • audrey_w
    replied
    Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

    Originally posted by thebanned1
    this is my point exactly... and when u damage the can on one side the can when squeezed falls in on itself from the top... honestly try it
    The word squeeze, by definition, means simultaneous pressure from more than one side. If you can uniformly squash your tin with one finger then i'll accept your theory

    Leave a comment:

Working...