Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
This is like the black sox scandal where the kid says "say it aint so bo!"
What next? No santa?
So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
Collapse
X
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
It appears we have hit a low. I was going to say try to tell the stereotypical rich kid who wants to be a superstar dj that he has to work for years and suffer numerous setbacks, sacrifices, and rejections as opposed to buying a track and releasing it as a hit overnight.
But if well known artists are doing it (the buying and releasing part) then thats a major problem that erodes a decent chunk of credibility out of individuals and the "scene" as well...
Thats for me though, my view is often a bit more warped when in comparison to the norm.Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
No, I think that "spooky" made a track,
and sasha put his name on it.
But Im not sure, I cant remember.Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
Ah ok I think I remember, but I was under the impression that tracks were co-produced with spooky doing more than his fair share...
Not familiar with this topic, I think my perceptions will be somewhat more jaded and muddled than before.Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
Something similar happens
with spooky and sasha
if I remember well, right ??Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
Pretending to mix now pretending to produce.
What next? Pretending to listen and pretending to like the music?Leave a comment:
-
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
hes got some nerve then
Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
Unkle have been doing for years. Lavelle gets the band together, they knock out some tracks, Lavelle puts his name on the track.Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
I dunno bud, my super right wing friend (by birth not choice) is a singer/songwriter, he's paid money to increase in youtube hits. Same thing really. Cheating is cheating is cheating. It's not about being a dem or repub. It's about having integrity.
The reason I'm not shocked is the entertainment business is super cut throat like any other business. SOME people are willing to do anything to "make it." They think $$$ is more important than morals. Misguided in some cases, desperate in others, but mostly just dishonest.Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
It's called being a democrat.
And yes the idea of ghostwriting and existence of that website is a total shame. Saw a post by Kate Simko the other day on FB that someone had release one of her remixes as their own track and selling it on Beatport. Ridiculous...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
^that's right. I thought this was common practice already?Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
basically some bedroom producers are making the tracks, they then sell it to that site - then if people like it, they can buy the full rights to it? Is that the scenario?
Its like all those peole that write for Rihanna but she makes the tracks herself, but they get the songwriting credit.
In this scenario - someone does ALL the work and receives ZERO credit? (but a payment) ??Leave a comment:
-
Re: So wrong! ProducerFactory.com
not gonna open that link at work, but if it is how you say it is darin....... how is that even legal? that sounds even more unethical than illegal downloads.Leave a comment:
Today's Birthdays
Collapse
[ms] Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 192,111
Posts: 1,238,124
Members: 53,134
Active Members: 31
Welcome to our newest member, MrMassive.


Leave a comment: