[QUOTE=88Mariner;924391]yes. anyone who doesn't zuck mohammed's dick is a zionist. grow the fuck you phaggot.
SO, following, is a long-ass list of very specific incidents that Dig says "oh muslims never did this, therefore your assertion that islam is an existential threat to western civilization is not true".
unfortunately for him, he passes up an excellent opportunity to make serious points about the direction islam is headed, the direction the western world is headed, the concept of demographic shifts across our planet, and history in general.
but he does so and instead vindicates Islam by saying 'they didn't do x y or z" therefore I [i]must[/] be wrong.
i could just as well say that the Mexicans didn't start WW1, or rape (lol) resources from foreign countries or prevent a pregnant woman from dying while giving birth at a checkpoint....but that wouldn't give me any force in asserting that the mexican's had no special role in shaping the future of the united states.
anyways, i've decided to spend a short amount of time humouring myself.
Right. that's never happened. ever.
no. but they carry on his tradition. they would never try to finish what he started. ever.
the west instigated WW1? the west instigated WW2?
Muslims never ever started any conflict ever. ever.
Christian nation? where? you keep talking about christian nations as if it were Islam vs. Christianity.
You're close. It's Islam vs. Non-muslims.
more misuse of the word 'rape'. RAPE RAPE RAPE. banks rape. bankers rape.
does that make money the penis that is doing the raping itself?
Ok? who has wall street suicide bombed recently?
[quote] Muslims do not attack Christian nations or any other and steal their resources[quote]
goddamn. really? steal? i'm wondering when our country will get paid back for any of the shit we've done to sort all the phaggots in the middle east. probably never. thanks for nothing.
pakistan shits in your general direction. as does iran. iraq. and ....i guess they would never stockpile if they could, and i'm sure they're never going to try.
the kurds weep in your general direction.
Of course not. And why should i give a fuck? They just kill people and incite violence on anyone who makes a cartoon of mohammed. fucking grow up already, will ya?
ah, and infidels i assume does not mean anyone in particular.
That's funny, because, like, the MSM is pretty much never going to describe a person as a 'muslim' unless they're praising the person. I don't recall the MSM ever calling Nidal Hasan a muslim (even though it's quite clear that's the case). Maybe the muslims DO control the MSM?
they actually do a pretty bang-up job defending you.
nor do they control bollywood (i think). western infidel propoganda is not permitted for entertainment.
pretty much true. I wonder why though. Maybe they're just too uptight? I'm quite certain they would never film gay porn though. For religious reasons, of course. (unless it was a snuff film?)
right...
afghanistan gets high in your general direction. they do control a majority share in the suicide bombing industry as well as the stoning-adulterers industry. Minority share in the child-marriage industry.
well that's a good thing.
exactly how much have you studied our form of government?
we would have won them if we weren't such goddamn humanitarians or that we didn't want to offend muslims by entering baghdad. hearts and minds for the win/lose/draw.
aren't you kinda....glad that we didn't 'win' those wars?
do muslims even do the whole foreign aid bit? what about humanitarian missions? charity work for non-muslims? anything?
did you just admit that it is muslims who are the ones inflicting pain and suffering on innocent men, women, and children. (we'll be seeing the M-W-C bit a lot here, i can tell)
no, they do it to themselves.
oil for food scandal hungers in your general direction. i"m not sure about the IMF probably not, but again, so? they don't control NATO, either. and? they dont' even control the red-friggin cross brah.
no, but they're responsible for the same in their own countries. i guess that's a draw.
RAPE RAPE RAPE. they do like raping their own women though. (and i'm sure boys, but i'd have to look into that further). when you hide women, you're bound to become attracted to boys - a bit like the catholic clergy in a way no?
no, the christians in the middle east are getting the fuck out on their own terms in fact.
and at least to your benefit, suicide bombing does not equal kicking out, a la egyptian coptic christians ....ad nauseum.
because we're not interesting enough to spy on. that aside, yes, they spy on each other. are you that naive to say that muslims don't ever spy?
well no shit
(here's your sign)
and India?
no, you're just destroying hindu shrines and stuff.
they also grovel at the feet of CAIR, too. it's a shame we recognize either to be honest.
this is actually true. I agree.
it would be nice if we could indemnify you for our services though.
responsible? no. complicit? yes.
[quote]the Muslims are not responsible for the thousands of dead Afghani men, woman and children
no, but they could have done something about it.
did you mean to say, "you can't blame muslims for hosting an alqaeda party in our territory" right?
we'll take the credit for the germans. the germans can take credit for the russians. and some of the russians can take credit for their own dead, too.
yeah, well, when you mess with the bull, be prepared to get the horns. we should have dropped those atomic bombs the day after pearl harbor to be quite honest.
nope. you were too busy fucking around in the desert to be relevant to global politics. i guess some muslims did stand against the soviet empire. hat tip.
see above.
friendly fire sucks.
i wonder what would happen to seoul if we pulled out of south korea tonight.
muslims dont' do false flag attacks. they do real flag attacks.
do muslims even recognize the supreme court as a legitimate law-making body? we don't do shariah law here. for good reason.
no, we have liberals and neocons to deal with.
i'm not sure what you're getting at here.
control? no. reject it? yes. you kinda touched upon this above. again, i'm not sure what this has to do with anything about the future threat islam poses to the freedoms of non-muslims. ( don't get me wrong, i want muslims to be free too - i just don't believe they'd accept what i propose)
no. what does this have to do with the fall of the western civilization? nothing, actually.
if everyone just converted to islam, it would be so much easier. they might not call it WW3 though.
christians? no? really???? well, certainly jews and hindus.
at least i haven't heard (yet) an open call to convert my group (the atheist alliance)
you've found better means to exact violence though. cheaper too. they certainly don't mind buying however.
where, pray tell, do the non-muslims blacks stand in the middle east?
nope. i guess muslims never owned slaves. ever.
what next....muslims didn't kill jesus, either?
no, they prefer to use human shields.
those egyptians are so open to the palestinians. yawn. walls exist to keep people out. not to keep people in. i wish my government knew to put up a big fuck-off wall on our country. even that wouldn't work a la that controversial radical muslim cleric that tried to sneak himself into our southern border in the trunk of a bimmer.
they rig their own elections.
bullshit. where is the green technology out in the middle east? where? anywhere? the middle east sells OIL that BURNS and kills babies.
lol.
first, the ozone layer hold is closing (you won't find it in a sura). man-made climate change is also a lie.
but yeah, c'mon son. you sell oil. ffs.
yeah that sucks. so do IED's.
RAPE RAPE RAPE.
already dealt with above.
you just pour acid on their faces, stone them to death, behead them, etc....
you're so focused on narrow instances that you're missing the bigger picture.
"no muslims ever ....xyz.....therefore the notion that islam presents an existential threat to western civilization is untrue".
lettuce apply this:
"no muslim ever let a pregnant woman die giving birth at a checkpoint therefore the notion that islam presents an existential threat to western civilization is untrue."
of course, we all know that it was allah's will to kill her.
nah, but they like using UN trucks to transport weapons. and they like blowing up american barracks.
neither is anyone else really.
that's because you don't normally see christians waging jihad against american soldiers out in bumblefuckistan. sample bias fail.
no. we atheist do that
we actually would do it to the koran but are afraid of physical violence.
.....
you're right. i agree.
again......
nope. but responsible for one of the greatest environmental disasters on the planet. it wasn't an accident though. it was intentional.
that was covered with the supreme court above.
can universities be controlled? you use the word 'control' alot as if to assume that's how it should be.
at least we have room to be dumbed down though.
you're repeating yourself again. you're raping repetition!
of course not.
ok? i guess calling mary magdelene a whore is one criteria with which to judge an existential threat to western civilization.
but for 9/11 the spying wouldn't exist. would it? hmmm
muslim's are not to blame for the invasive tsa procedures.
if a muslim snuck a bomb onto a plain in his anus and was caught, would you also assert that the new anal-probing of flight customers is not related to anything a muslim did?
see above.
yeah only lewinski was involved in sucking dick.
give yourself a pat on the back.......
nope, but you're well on teh way to sending europe down the shitter.
you really haven't done a good job to be frank.
do you really think your allusions are not transparent? see my post up above.
thanks for sparing me the whole "muslims didn't kill michael jackson" and "muslims don't listen to Creed" and "muslims don't like tiesto" bits....
ok
oh right. did i say 'enemy'? i said existential threat to western civilization.
well i get daily zionist talking points, i have my zionist decoder (both ring and in my watch) a zionist merit badge, a zionist flag, a zionist x-ray glasses... i mean what ELSE am i suppposed to do with all of these gadgets?
my kind? lol. what kind is that? oh right 'zee joooz'
speaking as an atheist, you're out of your goddamn mind. really, i'm not impressed.
@ Trick: Scared? No. Concerned? Greatly.
I don't really have a desire to see the rest of the modern world devolve into the likes of pakistan or iran. given the demographic trajectories, we could see this happening across europe in the next 150-225 years.
and you really can't 'undo' the problem without a radical change of policies. i think europe is 'kinda' waking up to this. 'kinda'.
Time is on my side.


Leave a comment: